Preskoči na glavni sadržaj

Cookie settings

We use cookies to ensure the basic functionalities of the website and to enhance your online experience. You can configure and accept the use of the cookies, and modify your consent options, at any time.

Essential

Preferences

Analytics and statistics

Marketing

Peer Review Feedback Form

This survey is the official tool for submitting your feedback on a pilot solution, using the shared New European Bauhaus (NEB) assessment framework. Your responses will support a fair, evidence-based, and comparable evaluation across all Mediterranean pilot contexts.

Please ensure your feedback is:

  • Constructive, respectful, and clear

  • Grounded in evidence rather than assumptions

  • Comparable across pilots and contexts

  • Focused on learning and improvement

Your completed survey will contribute directly to the individual pilot evaluation reports and the cross-pilot synthesis.

Thank you for your time and valuable expertise.

We are pleased to launch Phase 1 of the Transnational Peer Review Process.

As part of this first step, we invite all reviewers to access and carefully review the NEB Peer Review Feedback Survey, now available on the Decidim platform.

This survey is a key tool to ensure that all pilot solutions are assessed in a structured, comparable, and evidence-based way, aligned with the three New European Bauhaus dimensions:

  • Sustainable (environmental impact, circularity, resilience)

  • Beautiful (quality of experience beyond functionality)

  • Together (inclusion, accessibility, fairness)

What you should do now

  • Open the Peer Review Survey on Decidim

  • Familiarise yourself with the questions and scoring structure

  • Note any clarifications you may need ahead of the review sessions

  1. Pilot name

    Short answer

  2. Reviewers

    Short answer

  3. Evidence/data provided by the pilot

    Multiple option

    • Photos/visuals/design documentation
    • Monitoring data/metrics
    • Before–after comparison
    • Technical documentation (materials, lifecycle, energy, etc.)
    • Participation records (attendance, outputs, stakeholder mapping)
    • Testimonials/interviews
    • Policy links/agreements/governance documents
    • Other

  4. What worked well in terms of the evidence/data presented?

    Short answer

  5. What were the limitations or gaps in the evidence/data?

    Short answer

  6. Assessment by NEB dimensions

    Title and description

  7. Beautiful

    Title and description

  8. What ambition does the pilot achieve?

    Single option

    • AMBITION I - to activate: Context re-activation • Sensory experience • Aesthetics
    • AMBITION II - to connect: Connection across contexts • Collective experience • Sense of belonging
    • AMBITION III- to integrate: Enabling creation • Restructuring of values • Long-lasting movement

  9. Strengths (quality of experience and design value):

    Long answer

  10. Gaps/risks (experience, usability, coherence)

    Long answer

  11. Recommendations (actionable improvements)

    Long answer

  12. Sustainable

    Title and description

  13. What ambition does the pilot achieve?

    Single option

    • AMBITION I - to repurpose: Preservation • Repair, re-use, reduce upgrade, renew
    • AMBITION II - to close the loop: (Industrial) system circularity • Waste transformation
    • AMBITION III - to regenerate: Carbon storing • Enhancing biodiversity • Restoration and expansion of natural landscapes • Paradigm shift, behavioural change

  14. Strengths (what works well and why)

    Long answer

  15. Gaps/risks (what is missing or uncertain)

    Long answer

  16. Recommendations (actionable improvements)

    Long answer

  17. Together

    Title and description

  18. What ambition does the pilot best achieve?

    Single option

    • AMBITION I - to include: Equality • Accessibility • Prioritising disadvantaged people
    • AMBITION II - to consolidate: Overcoming segregation • Representation and social stability • Sharing resources and opportunities
    • AMBITION III - to transform: Fostering shared social values • Societal development and collective growth • New ways of living together

  19. Strengths (inclusion and social value)

    Long answer

  20. Gaps/risks (equity, access, representation)

    Long answer

  21. Recommendations (actionable improvements)

    Long answer

  22. Key messages

    Title and description

  23. Top 3 strengths

    Long answer

  24. Top 3 improvement priorities

    Long answer

  25. A concise judgement summarising performance, evidence strength, and next steps

    Long answer

Confirm

Please log in

The password is too short.